DISQUS

The Music Rocks!: Blatant Plagiarism of “History of Deep Purple” from Wikipedia

  • aswanlund · 1 year ago
    Yep - that would be called plagiarism, although in all fairness to this person, I do need to say it's possible THEY contributed this information themselves to Wikipedia. However, even if this IS the case, they've created duplicate content. Which we all know is a Google no-no.
  • Patti Stafford · 1 year ago
    Hmmmm.
  • Patti Stafford · 1 year ago
    I agree. If he's the author he should give himself credit.
    His page rank bar is grey. Its' a new blog, but not any newer than this one. Our bar is still white--because we haven't angered the Google God.

    Duplicate content gets you a grey bar every time.
  • Muzica Noua · 12 months ago
    Like your duplicate comments, hehe ?
    Duplicate content wont get in specific grey bar, its all about the backlinks in the end.
    even if your content is not original, with some backlinks you can get in green
  • Patti Stafford · 12 months ago
    LOL. I had no idea that comment was there twice. I think I commented and it didn't show up so I commented again. I'm new with disqus. I can't delete the duplicate comment so I had to edit it...until I figure out how to get into the settings and remove it.

    Live & learn huh?
  • Link Building Service · 11 months ago
    no self respecting writer or website/blog owner will endorse plagiarism but its there. and now, its out there even at large. its good thing that goodle came out with duplicate content penalty and those sites stealing content from other sites will not get too far anymore
  • girdles for women · 6 months ago
    Who should take the action in this certain manner? "Stealing is stealing–it doesn’t matter what form it comes in." I love this quote, your right there are some bloggers copying their article from others just to impress their readers, too bad they have to do such things