The Music Rocks! - Latest Comments in Blatant Plagiarism of “History of Deep Purple” from Wikipedia

Re: Blatant Plagiarism of “History of Deep Purple” from Wikipedia

girdles for women — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:33:11 -0000

Who should take the action in this certain manner? "Stealing is stealing–it doesn’t matter what form it comes in." I love this quote, your right there are some bloggers copying their article from others just to impress their readers, too bad they have to do such things

Re: Blatant Plagiarism of “History of Deep Purple” from Wikipedia

Link Building Service — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:43:16 -0000

no self respecting writer or website/blog owner will endorse plagiarism but its there. and now, its out there even at large. its good thing that goodle came out with duplicate content penalty and those sites stealing content from other sites will not get too far anymore

Re: Blatant Plagiarism of “History of Deep Purple” from Wikipedia

Patti Stafford — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:22:14 -0000

LOL. I had no idea that comment was there twice. I think I commented and it didn't show up so I commented again. I'm new with disqus. I can't delete the duplicate comment so I had to edit it...until I figure out how to get into the settings and remove it.

Live & learn huh?

Re: Blatant Plagiarism of “History of Deep Purple” from Wikipedia

Muzica Noua — Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:36:00 -0000

Like your duplicate comments, hehe ?
Duplicate content wont get in specific grey bar, its all about the backlinks in the end.
even if your content is not original, with some backlinks you can get in green

Re: Blatant Plagiarism of “History of Deep Purple” from Wikipedia

Patti Stafford — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:13:01 -0000

I agree. If he's the author he should give himself credit.
His page rank bar is grey. Its' a new blog, but not any newer than this one. Our bar is still white--because we haven't angered the Google God.

Duplicate content gets you a grey bar every time.

Re: Blatant Plagiarism of “History of Deep Purple” from Wikipedia

Patti Stafford — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:09:55 -0000

Hmmmm.

Re: Blatant Plagiarism of “History of Deep Purple” from Wikipedia

aswanlund — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:00:19 -0000

Yep - that would be called plagiarism, although in all fairness to this person, I do need to say it's possible THEY contributed this information themselves to Wikipedia. However, even if this IS the case, they've created duplicate content. Which we all know is a Google no-no.